Educo listens to its employees and its executive team responds

Educo has different internal communication channels to facilitate the exchange of information across the entire organisation, thus contributing to improving efficiency in their work and encouraging staff to present their feedback and complaints to management.

Greenpeace implements a 360 degree performance evaluation on its Board of Directors

The Greenpeace International Board of Directors Chair coordinates a 360 degree evaluation of the performance of the Board (as a whole) each year. This consists of three separate online surveys; one is sent to the Board members for a self-evaluation; one is sent to the Trustees; and the third is sent to the GPI Management. The results are collated and provided to the Trustees via the annual Board Report to Council submitted at each Annual General Meeting (AGM).

Using accountability reporting as an organisational development process

Amnesty International’s report submission to Accountable Now is based on analysis and inputs from International Secretariat staff who have oversight over different areas of accountability. These members of staff – internally referred to as ‘Accountable Now indicator owners’ – assess performance, reflecting on the Independent Review Panel’s (IRP) feedback, movement data and their own expertise.

90% of Amnesty’s national entities provided inputs for the accountability report

Each year, every Amnesty International entity submits a Standard Action Report (SAR) containing information on their activities, campaigns, growth and accountability measures for the past year. The SAR data is collated and analysed to support global planning and measurement of the movement’s performance against stated plans.

Transparency International’s board members are mutually and externally accountable

Transparency International (TI) Board members are subject to the TI Board Code of Conduct and the TI Conflict of Interest policy. As such candidates for Board election are required to compile a register of interests which is circulated to the electorate along their biography and election statement. As a matter of fact, candidates for election on the Board are occasionally subject to questions from the voters on potential conflicts of interests during TI election hearings.